<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: How not to use social media in politics</title>
	<atom:link href="http://brendanhughes.ie/2009/02/25/how-not-to-use-social-media-in-politics/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://brendanhughes.ie/2009/02/25/how-not-to-use-social-media-in-politics/</link>
	<description>brendanhughes.ie</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 05 Jan 2012 07:18:25 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mistletoe and Wine &#8211; 2009 Review &#171; Brendan Hughes, talking about the Internet in business and society in Ireland</title>
		<link>http://brendanhughes.ie/2009/02/25/how-not-to-use-social-media-in-politics/#comment-1864</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Mistletoe and Wine &#8211; 2009 Review &#171; Brendan Hughes, talking about the Internet in business and society in Ireland]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 06 Dec 2009 17:34:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://brendanhughes.ie/?p=303#comment-1864</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] February we had the now infamous gaff by Fianna Fail who invited bloggers to the launch of their new website without telling them that they were [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] February we had the now infamous gaff by Fianna Fail who invited bloggers to the launch of their new website without telling them that they were [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: A week is a long time&#8230; &#171; Brendan Hughes</title>
		<link>http://brendanhughes.ie/2009/02/25/how-not-to-use-social-media-in-politics/#comment-1326</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[A week is a long time&#8230; &#171; Brendan Hughes]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 14 Jun 2009 20:08:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://brendanhughes.ie/?p=303#comment-1326</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] Blake (FF,  Donegal) was the PR expert and FF councillor behind the Joe Raspers debacle earlier this year who redeemed himself largely due to his blogging activities. Damien lost his seat [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Blake (FF,  Donegal) was the PR expert and FF councillor behind the Joe Raspers debacle earlier this year who redeemed himself largely due to his blogging activities. Damien lost his seat [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Top 5 tips for blogger engagement &#124; Simply Zesty</title>
		<link>http://brendanhughes.ie/2009/02/25/how-not-to-use-social-media-in-politics/#comment-1204</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Top 5 tips for blogger engagement &#124; Simply Zesty]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 18 Apr 2009 09:51:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://brendanhughes.ie/?p=303#comment-1204</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] harm your campaign. The Fianna Fail party recently got this wrong and it has left many Irish bloggers feeling less than impressed&#8230; To help you avoid some of the common pitfalls, we&#8217;ve put [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] harm your campaign. The Fianna Fail party recently got this wrong and it has left many Irish bloggers feeling less than impressed&#8230; To help you avoid some of the common pitfalls, we&#8217;ve put [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Brendan</title>
		<link>http://brendanhughes.ie/2009/02/25/how-not-to-use-social-media-in-politics/#comment-1079</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Brendan]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 02 Mar 2009 19:51:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://brendanhughes.ie/?p=303#comment-1079</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Hey Martin. Yep, that&#039;s the outrageous bit. There are so many businesses in Ireland that are already selling their expertise in social media abroad and here Fianna Fail go importing &quot;experts&quot; from outside. It is actually incredible, and you are right, is a point that many commentators missed in all of this.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hey Martin. Yep, that&#8217;s the outrageous bit. There are so many businesses in Ireland that are already selling their expertise in social media abroad and here Fianna Fail go importing &#8220;experts&#8221; from outside. It is actually incredible, and you are right, is a point that many commentators missed in all of this.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: martin casey</title>
		<link>http://brendanhughes.ie/2009/02/25/how-not-to-use-social-media-in-politics/#comment-1077</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[martin casey]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 02 Mar 2009 09:20:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://brendanhughes.ie/?p=303#comment-1077</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Hi Brendan, the real issue here is why did Fianna Fail commission a US company to redevelop their website. It does not say much for their belief in the Irish industry. There are enough experts in Ireland to advise and deliver a solution to Fianna Fail without them going to the US. Don&#039;t forget it wants too long ago we were being asked to be Partiotic]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Brendan, the real issue here is why did Fianna Fail commission a US company to redevelop their website. It does not say much for their belief in the Irish industry. There are enough experts in Ireland to advise and deliver a solution to Fianna Fail without them going to the US. Don&#8217;t forget it wants too long ago we were being asked to be Partiotic</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Brendan</title>
		<link>http://brendanhughes.ie/2009/02/25/how-not-to-use-social-media-in-politics/#comment-1075</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Brendan]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 Feb 2009 21:58:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://brendanhughes.ie/?p=303#comment-1075</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[James, really interesting to see a different perspective on all this. Not only were bloggers duped, but the party faithful were also duped. Crazy stuff - inadvertant or not.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>James, really interesting to see a different perspective on all this. Not only were bloggers duped, but the party faithful were also duped. Crazy stuff &#8211; inadvertant or not.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: View from the Tracks &#187; Blog Archive &#187; A series of unfortunate events.. (and a new website!)</title>
		<link>http://brendanhughes.ie/2009/02/25/how-not-to-use-social-media-in-politics/#comment-1073</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[View from the Tracks &#187; Blog Archive &#187; A series of unfortunate events.. (and a new website!)]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 Feb 2009 16:38:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://brendanhughes.ie/?p=303#comment-1073</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] story short an online backlash ensued here here here and here for starters. Some wailing, some gnashing, some grumbling and some grievences. Some [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] story short an online backlash ensued here here here and here for starters. Some wailing, some gnashing, some grumbling and some grievences. Some [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: James</title>
		<link>http://brendanhughes.ie/2009/02/25/how-not-to-use-social-media-in-politics/#comment-1072</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[James]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 Feb 2009 13:12:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://brendanhughes.ie/?p=303#comment-1072</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Hi Brendan. I was one of probably a very small pool of people who got both invites and I was confused from a different perpsective. As an FF activist (nay candidate even :) I received the FF invite and was very excited at the prospect of Rospars coming to town and teaching the party new tricks. As someone who has been playing with these ideas myself for some time (and who has been online since first booting up an old BSD box out the back of the HamCaf - but we&#039;ll spare the anorak stories for now!) I was intrigued and hoped Rospars could fill a few the gaps in my own explorations of politics 2.0

I became aware of a second invite doing the rounds when I logged onto twitter later that evening and saw the other link doing the rounds and I was confused (In fact I tweeted directly to ask) whether this was an FF or a public event.. I couldn&#039;t understand why the party wasn&#039;t going all out for a bit of reflected glory.. might as well get a good news story in these troubled times...

Now as it happens I couldn&#039;t go on the night (alas had some old fashioned politics to do with offline folk) but was really sorry to be missing it. 

It is obvious now and I had been wondering even beforehand that wearing two hats (as the organiser involved here does and I fully accept his bona fides by the way) can lead to confusion and it backfired badly here.

But the fallout may not have been all one way - if I can highlight an alternate scenario, when I received the FF invite, initial thoughts were that this was a candidate seminar, then re-reading a party event, and then an FF hosted event. Nothing wrong with any of those and my invite was certainly fully &#039;FF&#039; branded etc. I was delighted the party were positively engaging in this domain. Neither I should point out, was there any indication whatsoever of secrecy or a coverup or anything of the sort, in fact I forwaded the invite directly to many friends and bloggers I thought might be interested. Which was exactly how it should have been promoted by the official organisers.

But had I gone up to the event, cancelled my other gigs and burnt a few brownies at home and abroad (which I was very close to doing until logistics prevailed) I might have been a bit annoyed to find there were multiple different audiences with multiple expectations and that there were suddenly a backlash emerging because a screw-up was made on the communications side. I&#039;d say I would have been rightly pi$$ed. So perhaps thankfully I didn&#039;t go in the end!

I think strawberry media have learned a lesson and it is a useful one for anyone in PR or in general (although it&#039;s fairly 101 stuff but how and ever). But I might close with an appeal. Let&#039;s not throw the baby out with the bathwater. There may be merits in the initative. In fairness it comes from a good stable (Rospars). I&#039;m certainly planning to try out some of the candidate features - although I won&#039;t be sending Michele any &#039;take down&#039; notices (for my own presence) just yet!

James]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Brendan. I was one of probably a very small pool of people who got both invites and I was confused from a different perpsective. As an FF activist (nay candidate even <img src='http://s0.wp.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' />  I received the FF invite and was very excited at the prospect of Rospars coming to town and teaching the party new tricks. As someone who has been playing with these ideas myself for some time (and who has been online since first booting up an old BSD box out the back of the HamCaf &#8211; but we&#8217;ll spare the anorak stories for now!) I was intrigued and hoped Rospars could fill a few the gaps in my own explorations of politics 2.0</p>
<p>I became aware of a second invite doing the rounds when I logged onto twitter later that evening and saw the other link doing the rounds and I was confused (In fact I tweeted directly to ask) whether this was an FF or a public event.. I couldn&#8217;t understand why the party wasn&#8217;t going all out for a bit of reflected glory.. might as well get a good news story in these troubled times&#8230;</p>
<p>Now as it happens I couldn&#8217;t go on the night (alas had some old fashioned politics to do with offline folk) but was really sorry to be missing it. </p>
<p>It is obvious now and I had been wondering even beforehand that wearing two hats (as the organiser involved here does and I fully accept his bona fides by the way) can lead to confusion and it backfired badly here.</p>
<p>But the fallout may not have been all one way &#8211; if I can highlight an alternate scenario, when I received the FF invite, initial thoughts were that this was a candidate seminar, then re-reading a party event, and then an FF hosted event. Nothing wrong with any of those and my invite was certainly fully &#8216;FF&#8217; branded etc. I was delighted the party were positively engaging in this domain. Neither I should point out, was there any indication whatsoever of secrecy or a coverup or anything of the sort, in fact I forwaded the invite directly to many friends and bloggers I thought might be interested. Which was exactly how it should have been promoted by the official organisers.</p>
<p>But had I gone up to the event, cancelled my other gigs and burnt a few brownies at home and abroad (which I was very close to doing until logistics prevailed) I might have been a bit annoyed to find there were multiple different audiences with multiple expectations and that there were suddenly a backlash emerging because a screw-up was made on the communications side. I&#8217;d say I would have been rightly pi$$ed. So perhaps thankfully I didn&#8217;t go in the end!</p>
<p>I think strawberry media have learned a lesson and it is a useful one for anyone in PR or in general (although it&#8217;s fairly 101 stuff but how and ever). But I might close with an appeal. Let&#8217;s not throw the baby out with the bathwater. There may be merits in the initative. In fairness it comes from a good stable (Rospars). I&#8217;m certainly planning to try out some of the candidate features &#8211; although I won&#8217;t be sending Michele any &#8216;take down&#8217; notices (for my own presence) just yet!</p>
<p>James</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Maman Poulet &#187; When is a seminar became a launch</title>
		<link>http://brendanhughes.ie/2009/02/25/how-not-to-use-social-media-in-politics/#comment-1067</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Maman Poulet &#187; When is a seminar became a launch]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 Feb 2009 01:23:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://brendanhughes.ie/?p=303#comment-1067</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] Brendan on  how not to use social media in politics [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Brendan on  how not to use social media in politics [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

